Skip to content

Fail to warn and go to jail?!? Maybe! Italian Earthquake Trial Focuses on Probability and Public Panic

October 4, 2011

There is an amazing manslaughter trial going on right now in Italy. Six seismologists and a government official in the central Italian city of L’Aquila are on trial for what the authorities say was a failure to warn the population before a deadly 2009 earthquake.  What?!?!?!

One thing the trial has done it to focus attention on the gnawing problem in disaster and earthquake-prone regions around the world: how to effectively communicate the risk of potential disaster.  It is true that scientists and government officials have difficulty telling the public what they know about the risk of earthquakes in ways that help them prepare without freaking them out.

L’Aquila earthquake - April 6, 2009

Earthquakes differ from other types of natural disasters. Meteorologists can track a hurricane with precision, but seismologists cannot predict exactly when and where an earthquake will occur. Scientists have condemned the Italian prosecution for this reason, saying the defendants are on trial for failing to do something that is impossible.

What seismologists are increasingly able to do, however, is forecast the likelihood that a quake will occur in a certain area over a certain time. Statistical analysis shows, for example, that some seismic activity — a minor quake or a swarm of very small ones — increases the probability of a larger, destructive earthquake in the same area.

Earthquake funerals in a public square following the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake

That is the very question now being debated in Italy.  Months before the L’Aquila earthquake on April 6, 2009, the area had experienced an earthquake swarm. A subsequent earthquake killed over 300 people.  That probably increased the likelihood of a major earthquake in the near future by a factor of 100 or 1,000.  There is one slight complication in this story.  At the same time, a local man who is not a scientist issued several predictions of a large earthquake — specific as to date and location — based on measurements of radon, a radioactive gas that is released as the earth moves.  These predictions, none of which proved accurate, increased public anxiety in the city to such a fevered height that the Italian government convened a group of a national risk-forecasting commission, including the seismologists and the government official, in L’Aquila on March 30.

L’Aquila earthquake caused many collapsed buildings.

At the meeting, the seismologists noted that it was possible, though unlikely, that the seismic activity could be a sign that a larger quake was imminent. They also noted that there was always some risk in L’Aquila, which has a history of earthquakes. But in a news conference afterward, the message to the public became garbled, with the government official assuring that there was no danger.  The statement by the official, who is not a seismologist, reassured the citizens about a subject he is not an expert in, and the public chose to believe him.

What is the lesson from this current Italian drama?!?  Communicate clearly, communicate a strong and on-going preparedness message and don’t provide assurances that are beyond your ability or knowledge in order to provide comfort to an anxious public.  The best way to deal with the anxiety is to get ready!

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/04/science/04quake.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha210

3 Comments leave one →
  1. January 31, 2012 14:14

    This particular story has been discussed and rediscussed by members of the geologic and geophysical community. I agree with your assessment that people should increase their state of readiness so that they’re prepared for whatever disaster or calamity they’re faced with, and that the hazard should be communicated with the public.

    Italy faces multiple types of geohazards, some of them even cascading into each other. What do I mean? Earthquakes can cause landslides, and can be indicators of even bigger things at work below. Remember Mount St. Helens? Its eruption was foretold by the USGS, though they couldn’t be exact as to the time, when shallow earthquake swarms occurred with epicenters under the volcano. The magma was coming up. And when the mountain DID blow, mudslides not long afterwards destroyed much of the infrastructure in the area at hand. Italy faces the same potential problem, with MILLIONS of folks living in the shadow of Vesuvius.

    Plate tectonics is the cause, earthquakes are the result, and nonreinforced (in many cases ancient) masonry led to the level of damage faced.

    Will it happen again? Absolutely. When? Any responsible geologist would have to tell you they don’t know.

    Best to be prepared.

    • February 1, 2012 06:41

      Thanks for your post! Preparedness is the best answer for most of what ails us in these matters…alas many are not motivated enough to take it seriously….with many moving from the edges, hopefully this will begin to shift….Love your title – “trenchless.” Be well! Regina

Trackbacks

  1. To Judge in Italian Scientist Case: We’re Waiting for Your Statement « In Evidence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: